The Russian Mosin Nagant Page

Dedicated to the history and preservation of all historic military firearms

 

Soviet Sniper Articles

91/30 Sniper    Fake Sniper    Sniper Articles   Return to Main Page

Weapons Used by Soviet Snipers    


 
HISTORY                                                                                        ARMOUR (21/25) 1998

Illustration 1 – Soviet sniper with sniper rifle model 1891/30 with telescopic sight PE (1934)

WEAPONS USED BY SOVIET SNIPERS

SERGEY MONETCHIKOV

Translated by Paul Tamony 

After the First World War sniping became an integral part of army life, forming an essential part of military training for marksmen selected from the ranks. However, in our country serious interest in what a sniper could do had to wait until the end of the twenties, interesting not so much the higher military command but the chiefs of the all-powerful OGPU-NKVD. Close military technical co-operation between the Soviet Union and the Weimar Republic of Germany ensured the delivery of the latest military equipment and weapons to our country during that period together with weapon production technology.  At that time too the first factories producing telescopic sights appeared in the USSR. This very fact, combined with the start on improving the basic infantry rifle – the Mosin three line, led to the production of the first Soviet type of sniper rifle in 1927-28 modelled on the dragoon rifle type 1891. 

 


 

Illustration 2 – Section of the type 1891/30 sniper rifle with VP (view from left) telescopic sight. 

 

 

Illustration 3 – Securing the VP telescopic sight to the 1891/30 type sniper rifle.  


THE NEW sniper variant of the old rifle was fitted with a D III («Dynamo», model 3) 4-magnitude telescopic sight. The first national telescopic sight D III was a copy of the German «Zeiss» sight and was designed for accurate fire at small targets appearing briefly in the marksman's angle of fire. It was an optical image amplification device fitted with an elevation adjuster and lateral deflection recorder. The top part of the eyepiece had a micrometer with range drum and graduation scale from 1 to 10 (through D every 100 m) and on the left it had a horizontal scale lateral deflection drum. The sight device consisted of a vertical hairline with a sharp extremity (the sight stub) and horizontal hairlines placed at right angles to the stub. The upper edge of the horizontal hairlines was level with the sharp end of the stub forming a sight crosshairs. As long as the aiming device and the target image were within the focal plane of the sight lens, the rifle was aimed by lining up the point of the crosshairs with the target image. 

Illustration 4 – Section of sniper rifle type 1891/30 with PU telescopic sight (view from left)


Aimed fire could be carried out with the sniper rifle fitted with a telescopic sight from 100 to 1000 m’s, and a distance of 600 m with an open tangent sight (without removing the telescopic sight). The new weapon fitted with our sights proved to be very efficient. So much so that when firing off a 10-shot ripple fire over a distance of 100 m the dispersion pattern was 3.5 cm, over 200 – 7.5, over 400 – 18.0 and over 600 – 35.0. Sniper rifles had already become part of the armament of the escort guards and border troops of the OGPU-NKVD. The Soviet Armed Forces brought in an analogous weapon two years later – in 1930.  Whilst the designers at the design bureau of the Tula ordnance plant were carrying out detailed work on improving the standard weapon, they developed a special sniper rifle, the 1891/30 type 7.62-mm rifle, which differed from the standard model by having a telescopic sight, a high-quality barrel, a bolt cylinder handle bent downwards to facilitate loading, no bayonet, a foresight raised by 1 mm and trigger pressure reduced to 2 – 2.4 kg. 

 

Illustration 5 – Securing the VP telescopic sight to the 1891/30 type sniper rifle. 

The basic ballistic features of the sniper rifle (without bayonet) were analogous to those mass-produced rifles, but the purpose-built rifle was more accurate. It was selected from the weapons showing the best firing results and was specially produced with a more finely finished bore surface and reduced tolerances.   

Illustration 6 – Section of the SVT-40 sniper rifle with PU telescopic sight (view from left). 

The combat stability of sniper rifles was considerably greater than that of mass-produced products, due to the stock being more carefully adjusted to the breech. The stock was generally made from high quality material – namely walnut wood. Because the sight setting overlapped the cartridge clip slot in the breech, sniper rifles could not be loaded with standard five-round clips. They could only be loaded with one cartridge, which greatly reduced their efficiency in combat. 


 

Illustration 7 – Sniper I. Antonov, a naval rating from the Baltic Fleet, in ambush. During the Great Patriotic War this expert marksman killed more than 300 fascists. 

At first, the 4-magnitude sight mark PT of the 1930 model was adopted for the army sniper rifle, but once its defects had become apparent, an improved modification, the VP optical sight model of 193I appeared the following year. But even in the case of this sight Model, our designers could not achieve a completely airtight eyepiece due to a poorly designed dioptric ring. Both the PT and the VP sights, as well as the D III sight were mounted on a bracket designed by A. A. Smirsky. The base of this mounting bracket was firmly secured by a guard with six screws to the front part of the breech, although such a sight arrangement made it difficult to load the weapon. Consequently an improved 4-magnitude type PE sight replaced the VP telescopic sight in 1936-1937. Weighing 0.62 g, it was designed to fire over a range of up to 1400 m. The reliable "Seso" bracket construction with sight fixed to the side greatly influenced the precision of aim during firing, and also allowed the use of an open ramp sight in case of damage during action.   


 

Illustration 8 The PU

The VP 

In the nineteen thirties the "Voroshilov marksmen" achieved great prominence throughout the Soviet Union. Training in aimed fire assumed great importance. A large-scale network of indoor ranges developed and young people learned to shoot on numerous courses and in the Osoaviachim schools. The sniper weapon went through its first great baptism of fire during the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-40, when the excellent qualities of our rifles fitted with the VP, PT and PE sights were demonstrated in combat. 

 

 
Illustration 9 – The 1891/30-type sniper rifle with PU telescopic sight and the SVT-40 sniper rifle with PU telescopic sight. 

The reliance placed by the higher military command before the war on the large-scale use of automatic weapons by the infantry led to the plan started in 1937 to replace the 1891/30 sniper rifle with the 7.62 mm automatic sniper rifle that used the S. G. Simonov (AVS) of 1936. However, the high dispersion factor even during single shot fire resulted in only a small batch of Simonov sniper rifles being produced. Three years later in 1940 the 1891/30 7.62 mm sniper rifle was replaced by the new 7.62 mm self-loading sniper rifle that used the Tokarev (SVT) system. This differed from the basic SVT-40 standard model by not only having a new general-purpose 3.5 magnitude PU telescopic sight (the universal sight), but also by its precision made bore that enhanced its accuracy.  

 Illustration 10 – The 1891/30 sniper rifle with PU telescopic sight. 

The 1891/30 sniper rifle with VP telescopic sight. 

 

Illustration 11 – 1891/30 sniper rifles with the VP telescopic sight and the SVT-40 sniper rifle with the PU telescopic sight.  


The PU sight weighing 0.27 kg was a lot lighter than its predecessors. Fixing the PU sight with a bracket above the breech according to the Tokarev system enabled the rifle to be fired over a range of up to 600 m with an open ramp sight. The great success of the new sniper self-loading SVT rifle compared with the Mosin magazine rifle was its elevated rate of fire – from 25 to 40 aimed shots a minute. The SVT-40 sniper rifles were widely used essentially for shooting at different targets appearing in the field of view for only a short time.  However, the hard reality of fighting at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War clearly indicated that the SVT-40 sniper rifle, despite its many fine qualities, was considerably inferior to its predecessor with respect to the main feature regarding this weapon – consistent grouping. At the same time, the SVT sniper rifle had a wide range of other faults. According to front-line soldiers who used this weapon, it was considerably inferior to the 1891/30 rifle when it came to accuracy over a range of more than 200 m. Its pronounced muzzle flash during firing gave away the position of the sniper (caused by the fact that the SVT's barrel was 100 mm shorter than that of the Mosin rifle). When fired the SVT had time lags, which made it impossible for the sniper to fire the second shot at the target. The numerous complaints about the SVT sniper rifles from the front forced the Soviet military command to recall once again the undeservedly forgotten old 1891/30-sniper rifle. The sniper SVT-40 was withdrawn from production in October 1941. However, not all of our warriors were so solidly set against the weapon. For instance, Hero of the Soviet Union Lieutenant Lyudmila Pavlichenko, the renowned sniper from the 54'" rife regiment of the 25 rifle division, killed 309 fascists with her SVT-40 sniper rifle in the fighting that took place around Odessa and Sebastopol. 

 


Illustration 12 – Hero of the Soviet Union Ivan Mrkulov knows that his invisible hat can be found anywhere. Fighting is going on in the marshes – the experienced sniper is camouflaged with sedge and reeds. 

At the beginning of 1942 the Izhevsk machine factory restored production of the 1891/30 sniper rifles. But even this rifle had certain shortcomings. First of all, the front-line troops did not like its weight or its inordinate length since working with it for long periods proved to be tiring for the sniper. Its low rate of fire – 10-12 aimed shots a minute – also failed to fully meet the requirements of modern mobile fast moving combat.   

Illustration 13 – Lyudmila Pavlichenko, Hero of the Soviet Union, in the forefront of defence. 

Its non-adjustable trigger action gave rise to strong complaints since its stiff trigger could not guarantee accurate aiming. The move to more simple technology and cheaper production resulted in stocks, made from birch wood since 1942, often becoming distorted and warped, which never happened to weapons with high-quality walnut stocks.  Some snipers commented on the poor quality of the optics, particularly of the PU sights produced in 1943-1944. Furthermore, front-line fighters discovered that when zeroing the rifle, the setting on the micrometer scale for vertical sight corrections did not always correspond to the actual distances and frequent adjustments of the vertical corrections led to horizontal deflection.   

 

Illustration 14 – Ivan Merkulov shows his young trainee Zolotoy how he should dress "to go hunting"

Attention was drawn to the poor positioning of the PU telescope sight on the rifle. It was noted in particular that the sight was placed far from the eye of the marksman which meant that when the sniper was taking up position to aim he had to move his cheek away from the rifle butt up to 3 cm and stretch his neck (to be able to observe the entire field of view without having lunar-shaped shadows – halo effects - along the edges). Because the marksman's head was in the wrong position his eye would be drawn away from the optical axis of the sight causing him to aim badly. 


Illustration 15 drawn by sniper sergeant Nikolay Sokolov. 

Apart from the telescopic sight, field glasses of 6-(8) magnitude and the TR observer tubes for observing the battle area formed part of our snipers' weapons during the war.  The experience of war convincingly proved that a sniper, in addition to his basic weapon – The sniper rifle – also needs additional weapons to deal with the enemy in close combat.  Many of our snipers going into the field took with them 2-3 hand grenades, pistols, Finnish hunting knives or the 1940-type scout knives. When working in pairs, snipers also took along machine pistols. These weapons were needed by snipers who often had to go beyond the forward edge of the battle area where they could easily stumble upon an ambush or an enemy reconnaissance patrol. The following ammunition was used by Soviet snipers during the Great Patriotic War: 7.62 mm rifle cartridges with light, heavy, armour-piercing (B-30), armour-piercing incendiary (B-32), ranging – adjustment incendiary (PZ) and tracer (T-46) bullets. Cartridges with light and heavy bullets, as a rule, were used for firing at enemy personnel; armour-piercing and armour-piercing incendiary rounds – for destroying machine-gun crews, guns (particularly direct laying guns) and PTR (RPG), and also for firing at the firing ports of firing positions (DOTs) and earth and timber strongholds (DZOTs), stereoscopic telescopes, motor transport and diving aircraft. Incendiary bullet cartridges were used for setting fire to installations, buildings and targets hindering the observation and bombardment of hidden enemy snipers, as well as enemy earth and timber pillboxes. Tracer bullet rounds – for target indication (when advancing). Ranging adjustment (explosive)) bullets used for firing at highly inflammable targets and for correcting fire directed at moving and stationary targets were generally not used by Soviet snipers at all during the war. The individual reserve (first line scale) of rounds depended on the task to be carried out by the sniper and on the type of battle (offensive or defensive). Most of our snipers usually took along 120 rifle cartridges of which 60% were cartridges of light or heavy bullets (usually of one batch), 25% – armour-piercing incendiary rounds and about 15% of incendiary and tracer bullets. 


 
Illustration 16  

1. Sniper's dugout. The sniper-fighter fires. The sniper-observer looks for the target after inserting his periscope into a hollowed-out cross. 

2. The most vigilant enemy sniper would not spot the marksman hiding at the bottom of this dugout. 

 3. This rick in which the sniper has concealed himself looks just like any other. 

 4. When fighting takes place in rocky mountains, the best camouflage for the sniper is – artificial stone. 

 

The constant increase in sniper activity in the Red Army demanded a considerable increase in the production of special arms. Between 1941-43 alone the factory "Izmash" sent to the front more than 330 000-sniper rifles of type 1891/30. War experience showed that this rifle fitted with the PU telescopic sight was one of the best in its class and was superior to the analogous weapon of our enemy (the 7.92-mm German sniper carbine Z.f.  Kar. 98k). In capable hands the 1891/30-type sniper rifle was a formidable weapon.  During the Great Patriotic War many Soviet snipers killed with their accurate fire several hundred Nazi soldiers each. For example, it is recorded in the service record book of the renowned sniper of the 169' rifle regiment of the 86 rifle division belonging to the 2nd Shock Army, staff sergeant N. F. Semyonov, who fought on the approaches to Leningrad from 29 August 1941 to 10 June 1943, that he killed 218 fascists. Furthermore, he taught and trained an additional 94 sniper fighters who, in turn, added a further 580 enemy soldiers and officers to this list. 

 

This article has used illustrations from the book "Sharpshooters" by T. Grits.

 

Sniper Tactics of the Great Patriotic War

The Soviet Sniper has been glorified and romanticized in film and print but do we really have an accurate picture of Soviet sniper tactics during the Great Patriotic War or as we call it, World Ward Two. These soldiers - both men and women carried a great deal of responsibility when they entered the battle. The general perception of snipers are that they are cold hearted assassins, natural born shooters and larger than life heroes. In fact, they were former factory workers, school girls and clerks. They came from every walk of life and were humble and self-sacrificing.

Soviet snipers were a part of the military planning and tactics long before the outbreak of the war. The Soviet experience from the first world war highlighted the importance of incorporating sharpshooters or snipers into their battle plans. Marksmanship and sharp shooting skills were emphasized in both the military and in official state run youth and recreation programs. When the rifle 1891/30 was developed it was also decided to develope a sniper variant. Up until that time the official tactics for small units largely ignored the importance of utilizing snipers equipped with special purpose rifles. The Soviet Army did utilize sharpshooters but they were equipped with either standard infantry rifles or sometimes civilian hunting rifles. However, the shooting skills of the Finns during the Winter War drove home a bloody point that could not be ignored by the Soviet high command. Soviet field commanders feared the presence of Finn sharpshooters and snipers and recognized that these snipers were able to disrupt the communications and flow of battle and served to demoralize front line troops. It was the experience of these commanders that shaped sniper tactics in the Soviet Army.

The initial plan was to equip every platoon sized unit with a sniper rifle to be used their best shooter. However, with only about 50,000 rifles in the inventory, the Army was hard pressed to man every platoon with snipers as the Army  expanded. An unfortunate decision by the command led to a further diluting of sniper effectiveness through the introduction of the SVT sniper rifle. This rifle suffered from a series of problems when used in the field as a result of its design as a semi-automatic rifle. For one thing, it did not respond well to extremely cold environments and suffered problems with the lubricant gumming up its working parts. Another problem was in cold shot accuracy where the first round fired would tend to wander significantly wide of the point of aim. Many snipers complained that the rifle was unwieldy and mechanically loud to operate.

By the time the Soviets were fully engaged with German forces a rush program was initiated to get the 91/30 Sniper fully into production. In 1942 production figures totaled in the 90,000 range. As more of these rifles reached units, existing tactics were put into practice and refined. To examine the tactics of the Soviet Sniper, it is necessary to review the philosophy for using snipers in the first place. Under the Soviet system, snipers were fielded in teams of two with a sniper and an observer. Both team members were qualified snipers and changed roles after each kill. The sniper was to provide both scouting duties as well as point and indirect fire to disrupt enemy activities and communications. The observer assisted in spotting potential targets, provided security and recorded and confirmed kills. Each sniper carried a "kill book" where they recorded time, date, location and details of each kill or engagement. This book was also used to record detailed information on German troop concentrations and movements. As mentioned before, the sniper was assigned at platoon level and reported directly to the platoon leader. Most sniper teams worked autonomously and ranged ahead of advancing formations or across an assigned frontal sector.

The Great Patriotic War produced some changes to the way sniper teams operated. The advancing German Army moved rapidly and unpredictably, using flanking maneuvers to surround retreating or static forces and cut them off. Soviet commanders reacted to this by concentrating their sniper teams on their flanks out away from the main body to impede Nazi advances on the flanks. This required platoon teams to gather in larger groups that worked together to provide advance warning to the major command elements of German movement as well as to concentrate their firepower.

Contrary to popular belief, most sniper engagements took place at distances under 400 meters in rural settings and under 100 meters in urban settings. Sniper teams would move into the "no-man's land" separating the two sides under the cover of darkness and set up blinds or observation posts that were cleverly concealed. In the case of observing and harassing advancing troops, the sniper teams would blend in with straggling refugees that were largely ignored by the German forces and move ahead of the German advance, recording troop strength and composition. In the evening, they would slip under cover and close on German night defensive positions and conduct harassing fire at first light and then move rapidly out of the area. This was related to me by my father-in-law who served on the eastern front in the German Army.

When the German advances into Russia were finally halted, the Soviet forces were in so much disarray, that the common platoon sniper team concept went out the window. As the forces regrouped and reconstituted, control of sniper teams moved to the battalion level and in some cases such as in Stalingrad, division and army level. There was also a dramatic drain on trained snipers so ad hoc sniper training programs were put in place. There are several accounts of such sniper schools being implemented during the Stalingrad siege.

Tactics in urban areas were somewhat new to Soviet snipers as they fought in rural settings during previous conflicts. Much of the doctrine developed for urban sniper engagements was refined as sniper teams operated in those settings. Cover and concealment was fundamental operating in any environment but proved to be a challenge in the urban setting. Although the cities were in various states of ruin, the rubble that was fought in presented a unique challenge. In the countryside, cover and concealment was a matter of blending in with the natural foliage and scrub. In a city, rubble and buildings were quite angular and prone to making the rounded silhouette of the human body stand out. Snipers had to learn how to use the rubble to their advantage.

The sniper was given very specific responsibilities whether fighting in the country or the city and although those responsibilities were specific, the level of independent action afforded the sniper was unprecedented in the Soviet Army. The sniper was a scout, blocking force, psychological operations unit, and deadly marksman all rolled into one. To earn the coveted sniper badge he or she had to demonstrate skill with the standard infantry rifle, small unit tactics, engaging both land and air targets, use of grenades and sapper explosives and leadership. The men and women of the sniper corps were held to to a higher standard than mainstream troops and were expected to serve as role models.

This article does not do justice to bravery of the men and women who fought a very personal war, nor does it give a complete picture of their training and tactics. I will leave that up to many great authors who have written so well about the subject. For further reading, I would suggest the following books"

"Soviet Sniper's Handbook-1942", James F. Gebhart & Paul Tamoney

"Enemy at the Gates", William Craig

Various other works abound on the subject and can be found in most large booksellers and libraries.

On-line Resources:

Sniper Rifles of the Red Star, Mosin Nagant dot Net, Vic Thomas

The Battle for Stalingrad, Stalingrad.net

 

 

PU Sniper Practical Tips

by JohnM from Tucos

I have four PU snipers now and have examined a half a dozen others. I regularly shoot a couple of them and have learned a few things through observation and practical use that I thought I might share with some of you fellas picking up a PU sniper for the first time from SARCO. I test my rifles off the bench at a 100 yard indoor range, regularly shoot at a 100-300 yard military style range, and shoot long range precision target/tactical at a 1000 yard facility.

First on accuracy:

I have found a good PU 91/30 sniper will shoot 3 shots out of 5 touching at a 100 yards fairly consistently indoor or outdoor with good ammo. (That may sound unreal but this is a common occurrence with MOA rifles—it is almost assured that 2 or 3 shots will be touching when you put 5 .30 caliber bullets into an inch at a 100 yards) I don't hand load yet, so the best I use is new production S&B FMJ and I have had excellent results with silver tipped Czech green lacquered steel case, head stamp 63 (through 67)/bxn. The challenge is usually trying to hold the thing on target through the trigger pull! I found the following accuracy standards on a Russian Sniper page :

"A  91/30 PU rifle was expected to shoot 10 shots into 3.5 cm (1.38”) at 100m, 7.5 cm (2.96”) at 200m, 18 cm (7.09”) at 400m, and 35 cm (13.79”) at 600m." I would imagine this would be done off of some kind of mechanical vise type rest.

PU scope use:

1. Sighting through the PU scope, if you look to the lower portion of the field of view you will see a small circle with a vertical bar—this is the front globe and post iron sight. Move your eye/head position right or left until the bar (front sight post) superimposes over the bottom of the vertical reticule element. When it is aligned it will “split” into two thin lines that bracket the lower portion of the vertical reticule element. Then put your pointer on target. This will help you to consistently align your eye to the scope.

2. Get your eye up close to the scope so you have optimal field of view. It is not too comfortable but you will have more light and a more consistent scope picture. You won’t really have a cheek weld more of a chin weld. I have found that a major factor in achieving consistency with these short length scopes is a consistent scope picture, i.e. you can move your head/eye placement and the pointer will move slightly on the target. This is very apparent when holding on small long range targets. The trick is to again use the image of the front sight as a lens alignment reticule: position your head/eye so that you can (1. See full field of view through the scope, and (2. See the full circle of the globe sight hood—this is a must so you don’t have to move your head, only your eye—from pointer to front sight alignment image to target. If you consistently achieve this scope picture your head/chin placement will be more consistent and you should be able to achieve better groups and POI repeatability at different elevation settings.

3. Hold the horizontal reticule bars consistently level.

4. I takes some practice to get used to the horizontal bars and pointer reticule. With only 3.5 power you have to concentrate hard on the tip of the pointer and how you hold it on your target, and then repeat the hold for all the shots in your group. It is easy to find yourself just plastering the tip over a 2 inch square piece of tape at 200 yards, not really trying to place the tip of the pointer on it in a consistent manner. The rifle should be capable of shooting within about 2 inches at that distance, but on one shot if your pointer is at the bottom of the 2 inch square and the next shot your pointer is at the top of it. You may find that you have a group that is spread over 6 inches or more and you will be scratching your head wondering why. These PU’s are about as far from a target scope as you can get and still be looking through two pieces of glass. It is a real challenge to get the best out of your rifle using one. It is more of a precision optical sight, a couple steps above iron sights, rather than what you think of in terms of a modern day scope.

5. The Ordinance Corps manual states the windage adjust knob calibration marks are one mil (milliradian) which is 3.6 inches at 100yd and I have found this to be a practically correct.

6. Tighten the thumb screw down with a screw driver. I have found that finger tightening will allow the scope to move after a couple of shots.

Notes on scope setup:

1. These things were sighted in by a pro and the base lower vertical rough adjust screw may be punched and immovable. Or at the very least there are usually some punch marks that put pressure on the screws to keep them from falling out. Try to keep these screws aligned to their original struck positions (or at least note their position down if you are inclined to move them). Keep in mind that though the horizontal bars may be further towards the top of the scope than you like when sighted in at 100 yards, at 600 to 800 yards they will be at or near center scope—right where you like them to be when trying to make the long shot. If you want to center the horizontal bars at a 100 yards and your bottom screw is movable be sure to note down where it was originally set.

2. If you aim through the iron sights and hold them level to the horizon and then look through the scope and notice that the horizontal bars are not level there is probably a purposeful reason for this. It has to do with alignment of the scope longitudinal centerline to the bore longitudinal centerline. When you rotate the rifle along its longitudinal axis to bring the scope horizontal bars level, you are probably bringing the scope and bore longitudinal centerlines into alignment by centering the scope over the barrel. There may have not been enough room for adjustment on some of these re built, re used scope mounts and bases to get the scope over the barrel through means of filing the tabs on the mounts. Though it may seem awkward or unnatural to not hold the rifle in a perfectly vertical position, these fellas knew what they were doing when they set these things up. This alignment is critical in precision long range shooting or precision shooting at varying ranges.

Think about it: with scope CL right or left of bore CL you have to aim the scope (adjust windage) left or right to converge with the bullet at any given distance. You will be fine for a single distance, say 100 yards, but when you aim out to 200 or 300 you need to adjust windage to hit point of aim to compensate for the built in error caused by the difference in scope and bore longitudinal CL. Depending upon how far out this alignment is and if shooting at shorter ranges, this effect can be negligible. It will be much more pronounced at longer ranges but can be compensated for by preemptive windage settings in addition to the normal elevation settings as you sight in for each range. There will be more consistency and less room for error though, if you just rotate the rifle so the scope is over the barrel—that is why these guys set them up that way so you will aim over the bore CL.

Shooting it:

1. Consider taking the time to break in your barrel just like you would a brand new rifle. Properly breaking in should greatly reduce or eliminate fouling and greatly improve accuracy and consistency.

2. Re check all screws on scope/mount and rifle for tightness after first 5 shots. Check again after 20 shots and periodically there after. If groupings were good then spread for no apparent reason-- check for loose take down screw or scope screws. These little used snipers have not really been “shot in” yet with the actions seating snugly into the stocks as on a well used rifle.

3. Sighting in to point of aim is quick and easy with the PU scope. After your 5 shot barrel warm up, off rests, aim center and shoot a three shot group. Keep the rifle aimed center and don't move it while adjusting the windage and elevation knobs until the pointer is centered on the group you just shot. In this way you are aligning the scope to where the bullets just hit, so next group will probably be darned close to point of aim. The hardest part is the fine adjustment of the knobs—it is hard to move them in the small amounts necessary to pin point a bull at 100 yards so you may want to try it at 50 yards first to make it easier. There are two screws on top of the adjusting knobs that hold the silver elevation and windage calibrated rings in place. Loosening these screws slightly will allow you to turn the calibration rings to zero your settings. Be sure not to move the adjusting knobs while doing this.

4. Don't let the barrel get too hot! Shoot 3x5 and then give it a rest. Bring another rifle or two and rotate through them. This lets you get the most out of your range time but doesn't burn up one rifle.

5. Get to know your rifle. Record elevation settings for varying ranges and ammo. Note where the first few cold shots hit so you can compensate for it next time out and impress your buddies by screwing the mount on and hitting a first shot bull. These things are that predictable and will hold zero that well.

6. Or you can not shoot it and let it just sit there and admire its ungainly beauty. That is fine, too. Have fun and safe shooting, JohnM.

I worked up this isometric exploded view diagram of the PU scope windage and elevation knobs to give some info on how I corrected a couple of my PU scopes knobs from moving on recoil. I am winging it on the nomenclature, so feel free to comment and I will get it corrected.

Elevation and/or windage adjust knobs moving on recoil will kill any chance of achieving good groups and will hamper your efforts for efficient variable range practical shooting as well. The elevation and windage knobs should move stiffly and with an even stiffness over their entire travel. There is a compression washer under the adjusting knobs and one or both of the following may occur to cause the knobs to turn too easily thus move on recoil: 1.) the compression washer has flattened out enough over the years to no longer provide enough pressure. 2.) the wearing surfaces between the compression washer and turning surfaces have become worn smooth from use. This may occur in limited areas where the knobs are turned back and forth repeatedly, i.e. between the first few windage marks in either direction and in areas of or possibly through the full scale of the elevation knob. The solution is to put a little more bend back into the compression washers and slightly rough up the turning surfaces. You will be able to see where the metal to metal turning surfaces are by the worn bluing or shiny surface areas. That is all I will say on this procedure and only recommend doing it if you have some confidence in your mechanical ability. It is not rocket science and your are not breeching the internal integrity of the scope workings, but it is somewhat delicate work. You are servicing a mechanical area of the scope that sees some wear. I did it first only after I examined an extra scope I had on hand. I have successfully corrected two scopes that had adjust knobs that moved on recoil.

JohnM.

 

"...await the right moment for one, and only one well-aimed shot"
Vassili Zaitsev


The story of Vassili Zaitsev has long been believed to be a historical fact. However, there has not been any documented proof that the legendary sniper duel between Zaitsev and Konig ever took place. As a matter of fact, Beevor's account mentions Koning and other accounts mention a Thorwald. I am inclined to believe that the Soviet Command invented this story to inspire the beleaguered troops of Stalingrad in their darkest hours of fighting the German onslaught. As a matter of fact, I had an occasion to interview an elderly Russian gentleman who claimed to have trained under Zaitsev in Stalingrad. When I asked about the duel, he replied something to the effect of, "Its true if that is want you want to believe". I don't doubt that many duels occurred between the snipers of both sides. However, to believe that the German High Command went to the trouble to commit the chief instructor of their sniper school to finding and killing one Soviet sniper is a lot to accept.  That being said the story goes like this.....

To study the 91/30 Sniper rifle, it's useful to understand it's role in the critical stages of the Great Patriotic War. One of those critical stages was the battle for Stalingrad. The Sniper was key to harassing and demoralizing the attacking German forces. As the struggle for Stalingrad ensued, the snipers involved became Soviet heroes. One of them was Vassili Zaitsev. He became famous after the press had discovered that he accomplished nearly 40 kills in a ten day period. zaitsevsn.jpg (48341 bytes)He was renown for taking out his targets using a single round. It was a skill he had learned while shooting deer in the forests around Elininski, his home in the Ural Mountain foothills. On September 20, 1942, Zaitsev went to Stalingrad with the 284th Rifles Division. As his accomplishments made him a national hero, and as his fame spread across no-man's-land, the Germans took an inordinate interest in him. Major Koning was dispatched to Stalingrad from Berlin for the express purpose of eliminating the top Soviet snipers.  Vassili Zaitsev, was high on his list. The Soviets  learned of Konig's mission through interrogating a prisoner. Antony Beevor wrote, "Like Zaitsev, Koning first made a careful study of the terrain and of his victims before attempting a kill. When two Soviet snipers were killed by single rifle shots, Zaitsev began counter-stalking Koning himself. The duel lasted for several days. During this time Koning shot a political officer named Danilov who was "covering" the duel for Soviet propaganda (Danilov accompanied Zaitsev and stupidly gave away their position). Zaitsev finally got Koning by offering another sniper, his assistant Zulikov, as bait. Zulikov positioned himself and lifted his helmet over a wall, where Koning put a bullet through it. Kulikov cried out as if hit. Koning made the fatal mistake of exposing himself to confirm the kill, and Zaitsev shot him dead. The telescopic sight of his prey's rifle, allegedly Zaitsev's most treasured trophy, is still exhibited in the Moscow armed forces museum, but this dramatic story remains essentially unconvincing. It is worth noting that there is absolutely no mention of it in any reports.* "*Antony Beevor - Stalingrad, The fateful siege : 1942 - 1943.
 

Other Snipers

Vassili Zaitsev - 400 kills (149 Kills at the battle of Stalingrad)

The highest scorer only identified as "Zikan" killed 224 Germans by 20 November 1942.


Sergeant Passar of 21st Army was credited with 103 kills.


Kucherenko, an Ukrainian, killed 19.


An Uzbek from 169th Rifle Division killed five Germans in three days.


Anatoly Chekov killed 17 Germans in two days !


Corporal Studentov killed 170 Germans.


"Noble Sniper" Ilin, a commissar from a Guards rifle regiment, was credited
with 185 kills.

Ludmilla Pavlichenko like many other Russian women was trained as a sniper. She is credited with killing 309 Germans.

Lance Corporal Maria Ivanova Morozova also served as a sniper with the 62nd Rifle Battalion and won 11 combat decorations. She survived the war and became a senior accountant at a factory in Minsk

.


Sniper V. Kozlov, just being decorated for his 30th kill. A sniper reaching forty kills would receive the "for bravery" and the title of "Nobel Sniper"